Sunday May 04, 2008

A Link in the Chain: Diminishing marginal impact of Jewish Philanthropy

Posted by Gidi Grinstein
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

[This is the fourth of fifteen posts on Jewish philanthropy in Israel]

The Zionist movement survived and thrived on the philanthropic generosity of world Jewry. However, as Israel grows in economic and political power, the relative importance of philanthropic giving by Diaspora Jewry is diminishing. indepth comprehension of these trends is critical to create the sense of urgency that is essential of the necessary overhaul.

Initially, Zionism was fully dependent on Diaspora philanthropy. Adding cents to a dime, millions of Jews contributed to the Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemet Le'Yisrael), to the United Jewish Appeal, to Keren Ha'Yesod and to other charitable organizations. The list of Jewish philanthropists - individuals and families - that have made a significant, sometimes even transformative, contribution to Zionism is also remarkable. Rothschild, Wolfson or Montefiori are some of the most prominent examples.

Over the time leading up to 1948, Jewish philanthropy has evolved with the Zionist movement continuously playing a central role. It met needs of the nascent national movement and matured with it. Without their financial, political and diplomatic support Zionism would have not progressed to the extent and in the speed that it did. I doubt that there is any other parallel story of mass financial mobilization by any nation anywhere.

Upon the establishment of the State of Israel, world Jewry played a critically important role in absorbing millions of immigrants, redeeming the land, greening the desert, recreating the world of Torah or building our security and economic power. Many also bought State of Israel bonds.

However, the balance of power has shifted demographically, economically and now also in terms of quality of life.

First, on demography: When the State of Israel was established, only five percent of world Jews lived in it (600,000 in total). According to some estimates, in 1995 the Jewish community in Israel became the largest in the world and more than fifty percent of Jewish babies were born in the State of Israel. This trend is strong and persistent.

Second, on economics: Obviously, in the early fifties Israel was is dire need of assistance. Its economy was small and Jewish philanthropy played a central role in covering the budget needs of the nascent state including in critical areas such as weapon acquisition.

Nowadays, the numbers leave no doubt. The marginal role of Jewish philanthropic giving relative to the overall size of the Israeli economy is diminishing rapidly. In 2007 alone, the Israeli economy grew by more than 7 billions dollars. If the Jewish philanthropic giving in Israel is estimated between 600 million to 1.2 billion USD, than Israeli economic growth this year is between 6-12 times the annual Jewish philanthropic giving in Israel. Within a few years the total of Jewish philanthropic giving in Israel would only amount to a half of a percent (0.5%) of Israel's economy.

Finally, on quality of life: No doubt that initially Israelis were relatively poor and the undertaking of absorption of millions of immigrants was huge. Diaspora communities mobilized to respond with financial and material support which often included clothing and food. However, during the fifties and sixties, Israel had been rapidly catching up to the quality of life of developed nations. By the early seventies, our standard of living was roughly 60% of the USA. Today, Israel enjoys a quality of life of a developed nation, albeit at the bottom of this family of nations.

All of these numbers point in one direction: the relative importance of world Jewry philanthropy in Israel is diminishing. Furthermore, if attempts to promote philanthropic giving by Israelis will succeed, the marginal role of Jewish philanthropy in Israel will diminish even further. (more on that in post no. 6 of this series).

These consistent and powerful trends are a challenge Jewish philanthropy. Their major advantage is one: understanding them may generate a sense of urgency that is essential for the overhaul.

Coming up: Part V: Where is the Israeli Center

Gidi Grinstein is the founder and president of the Reut Institute.

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print
Post your own comment
Be the first to comment to this post
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

A Link in the Chain Founder of the prestigious Reut Institute, Gidi Grinstein, blogs about his vision for Israel and 21st century Zionism.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular Posts

  1. The 'clash of civilizations'
    Posted in The Warped Mirror by Petra Marquardt-Bigman
    Tuesday Jul 22, 2008
  2. An impossible dream?
    Posted in In the Trenches by David Harris
    Tuesday Jul 22, 2008
  3. Life and death on King David street
    Posted in Reform Reflections by Rabbi Michael Marmur
    Thursday Jul 24, 2008
  4. Good news from American campuses
    Posted in Classroom Battlegrounds by Dr. Mitchell Bard
    Wednesday Jul 23, 2008
  5. Miss Sheitel 2008
    Posted in Modesty Blasé by Modesty Blasé
    Sunday Jul 20, 2008

Recent Comments

Lukas, Amsterdam: The main problem: lack of business management skills (project / programme management, quality management, people/resourcing/recruiting/teambuilding skills) AND the arrogant attitude that these things are not needed because we're so smart. Once a company grows over the entrepreneurial group's head, they panic, get selfish and sell it out abroad. There are a few, VERY few exceptions like Teva. The solution: train decision-makers in management (basic skills such as taught in an MBA programme).
Dror, Haifa Israel: Israel is a beacon of exploitation and injustice. Zion is supposed to mean a beacon for the Jewish people. The Land of Zion is the land of the Jewish people. The State of Israel has become simply put, evil and exploitative. Most average middle class Israelis are working for minimum wage and some for slightly more. Our corrupt self-serving government and economists refused to raise the minimum wage while giving themselves pay raises. People are barely surviving and are drowning in debt. The rich and well off flaunt and show off. God will smite down the wicked, unfortunately it is Israel's govt.
Gnarlodious: Israel is staggering because of bad television. Specifically, American television. Imitating America is a dead end for israel because Jews are very social people and Americans are so competitive. Israel can only reach its potential by teamwork, but everything on television is competition and stupidity. Israeli television is disturbingly similar, because Israel is imitating American media success. Enamoured of Ronald Reagan's "Greed is Good" ideology where the bottom line is building your own personal economic empire. Israel will fail following this example. Israel must reject Americanism.