Sunday Sep 21, 2008

A Link in the Chain: Closing the gap

Posted by Gidi Grinstein
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

There are several differences between Reut and other traditional think tanks. Most think tanks operate on the assumption that the central problem is connected to the collection and processing of information. So they deal with research. We say that the central problem lies with the cognitive, conceptual understanding of the problem. We don't provide answers, we ask questions.

People in think tanks are experts with knowledge and experience. Our team is young - the average age is 29 and there isn't one PhD among us. That means that we can ask questions, that we can apply ourselves to think about problems in a fresh way.

Our expertise lies in the area between disciplines, through creating new knowledge areas and a basis for quick decision making under uncertain conditions.

While most research institutes deal with research and learning, we offer services for decision-making. While other organizations deal with knowledge-experts, we employ process experts. While others progress in terms of knowledge, we try to understand the basic assumptions. We complement organizations such as the Israeli Democracy Institute, as we specialize in asking the questions, while they specialize in research. We also commit ourselves to very short reaction times, which are essential for designing and implementing policies in real time.

We don't provide advice, we provide a way of thinking. And we are apolitical on all levels of the organization.

Through our structure and methodology, we specialize in identifying blind spots, information that the decision maker doesn't know he doesn't know. It's within these blind spots that strategic surprises happen. Such examples are the Yom Kippur war, the first Intifada, Rabin's assassination, 9/11, Kodak's failure to identify the revolution of the digital camera or the textile industry which is desperately trying to survive. It's basically people or organizations that function according to certain assumptions even though the reality is changing and therefore don't manage to close the gap.

Closing such a gap requires a fundamental change in values and planning and is very difficult. But it's part of the challenge that Reut has set for itself.

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print
Post your own comment
Be the first to comment to this post
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

A Link in the Chain Founder of the prestigious Reut Institute, Gidi Grinstein, blogs about his vision for Israel and 21st century Zionism.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular

  1. Israel's actions are lawful and commendable
    Posted in Double Standard Watch by Alan M. Dershowitz
    Sunday Jan 04, 2009
  2. To all you "embarrassed" Jews
    Posted in Israel Stories by Jeremy Cardash
    Wednesday Dec 31, 2008
  3. "We are Hamas"
    Posted in The Warped Mirror by Petra Marquardt-Bigman
    Sunday Jan 04, 2009
  4. No plans to leave Ashkelon
    Posted in Living with Rockets by Ashkelon
    Wednesday Dec 31, 2008
  5. Averaging one grad per hour
    Posted in Living with Rockets by Ashkelon
    Tuesday Jan 06, 2009

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

JMK: Your arrogance is so typically Israeli, for you think the world revolves you and your wishes, secular, rational, comfortable, read Kissinger's doctoral dissertation "A World Restored" and his understanding of the staus quo establishment that would be Israel and revolutionaries who do not accept the present reality and its idealogy and values that would be the Arabs, Israel has no room for error, Israel has no room to be magnanimous, but since your idealogy is that of Tzadokim Hellenized compromised, your vision is clouded, think Chamberlin, Churchill not so much.
Tzvi Nokam/ amerikkka: He boasts of being part of the group that started the diasterous oslo agreement which led to many Jewish deaths. Gidi is good at negotiating a surrender
Lukas, Amsterdam: The main problem: lack of business management skills (project / programme management, quality management, people/resourcing/recruiting/teambuilding skills) AND the arrogant attitude that these things are not needed because we're so smart. Once a company grows over the entrepreneurial group's head, they panic, get selfish and sell it out abroad. There are a few, VERY few exceptions like Teva. The solution: train decision-makers in management (basic skills such as taught in an MBA programme).