|
Sunday Sep 07, 2008
The Warped Mirror: Why they love Livni Posted by Petra Marquardt-Bigman
Comments: 9
These days, it's not all that easy for an Israeli politician to get praise from the foreign press, which is often quick to take off the gloves when there is a chance to blame Israel for the lack of peace in the Middle East, if not the world. But Tzipi Livni somehow manages to get the press to reach for the velvet gloves and behave nicely. That is all the more remarkable given that Livni would seem to be a very unlikely candidate for such preferential treatment - after all, she began her political career as a protégé of Ariel Sharon, who is no favorite among foreign commentators. On top of that, she comes from a family of famous Irgun fighters, who nowadays would be labeled as terrorists by many. Yet, even on Al Jazeera, it is not Livni's background, but her "pragmatic stance" that is emphasized and illustrated by quoting her as saying: "I came to the painful realization that if I have to choose between a Greater Israel and Israel continuing to be a Jewish and democratic country, I must choose the latter." It was already more than a year ago that the foreign press decided to crown Livni as the rising star of Israeli politics. In July 2007, the Los Angeles Times declared: "The new face of Israel is a woman"; and the New York Times Magazine featured an in-depth piece by star-columnist Roger Cohen entitled "Her Jewish State". Even the British media that can always be counted on to find a critical angle on anything related to Israel seems taken by Livni and ready to accept her as "Guardian of Israel's future". One aspect that seems to impress people who have interviewed Livni is that she comes across as authentic - as the LA Times put it: "Livni is not a natural schmoozer like, say, Netanyahu; her English is not flawless and her Israeli accent remains thick. She often seems aloof." It is perhaps precisely the perception that Livni is not a smooth political operator that makes her interviewers accept her views at face value, without the usual search for ulterior motives. In addition, Livni appears as very consistent in her core convictions. It is instructive to compare some of the older reports on Livni with current reports. This is what Livni was quoted as saying in the LA Times article published more than a year ago: "I couldn't live anymore with a party [like the Likud] whose ideology or platform starts with the words no, no, no. No Palestinian state, no this, no that ...The center ... should not be a vacuum between left and right; the center is an ideology." And this is what The Jerusalem Post's Herb Keinon reported from a Livni speech on the campaign trail last week: "Livni tried to provide the party activists with a vision, saying a centrist party was not a default option, but rather a choice, and that it was driven by an ideology that rejected both the nay-saying of the Right, and the reality-avoidance of the Left." The way Keinon put it - "the nay-saying of the Right, and the reality-avoidance of the Left" - may well provide a clue why Livni is able to sway even members of the liberal-leftist press abroad in her favor: she firmly rejects right-wing notions that peace between Israel and the Palestinians is either not possible, or not desirable, and she has indeed argued that a peace agreement is in Israel's vital interest; but it is precisely this very pragmatic approach that views peace not so much as an ideal, but as a necessity, that lends a certain credibility to Livni's criticism of the "reality-avoidance of the Left." The views of an Israeli politician on peace are obviously the main focus of the foreign press, and while Livni has been occasionally criticized by Israeli commentators for not being specific enough about her vision, she has actually published a rather impressive outline of her ideas more than a year ago - in Asharq Alawsat, the London-based Arabic language daily newspaper. Her core convictions, which surface consistently in every interview she gives, are reflected in this article, including her political credo:
Western diplomats who have worked with Livni credit her with a willingness to go the extra mile in order to find some creative formula for a solution when it comes to the negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians; at the same time, Livni has put down very firm "red lines" that make her a rather hawkish dove - but that is apparently regarded by many commentators as just another indication that she has what it takes to claim the center for herself.
1 | Adina Kutnicki, Sunday Sep 07, 2008
What precisely is a 'hawkish dove'? Is that akin to being a little pregnant? Those who can see farther than their noses, and farther than the approbation of the international media (and the totally entrenched left wing Israeli media) will notice that Livni is so FAR astray from her hawkish roots, that she is now a serial left wing champion. Name ONE thing which she has actually backed, as opposed to rhetorical 'red lines', which attest to anything BUT her left wing agenda? Time after time she has repeated - is is in Israel's strategic ! interest to implement a PA (terror) State.
2 | Ehad Haam, Sunday Sep 07, 2008
Adina Kutnicki: There are people who are so far to the right that everyone else seems left to them. Livni is squarely in the center of the Israeli political map. As such, she has the ability to draw support from both left and right. And no, being a "hawkish dove" is certainly not like being a little pregnant; it is more like relinquishing chastity without becoming promiscuous.
3 | Adina Kutnicki, Monday Sep 08, 2008
Sorry Ehad, but particulalry in the cesspool of the middle east, either you stand for something, or you stand for nothing, despite the pandering resume of Israeli politicians. You can't be all things to all people, just to get elected. One can legitimately compromise on some issues, but NEVER on core issues, such as giving up our heartland. And that position does not make one a hard right fanatic.
Besides, you did not state ONE thing which labels her a centrist.
Get back to me if you can document her legitimate, unvarnished centrist accomplishments.
4 | Ehad Haam, Monday Sep 08, 2008
Adina, some people define left and right by a single issue: the acceptance of territorial compromise. If that is your definition, then, yes, most Israelis (Livni included) are left. But once you accept that territorial totality is incompatible with Zionism and democracy, you begin seeing a much broader spectrum between left and right. There are issues of risk taking, security, gradual relinquishment of control over Palestinians, budget priorities, the rule of law, respect for minorities, all these and more are issues that gain importance when the need for territorial compromise is understood.
5 | James, Monday Sep 08, 2008
A story about a little assimilated Jewish girl, who could not live with too many nos, so she married a goy and there is no end ever since.
6 | yona loriner "jeru", Tuesday Sep 09, 2008
i dont think they like her at all!!! the only think she has is that she doesnt take bribes big deal!!!
7 | Petra, Bat Yam, Tuesday Sep 09, 2008
Adina, I have to say that I very much agree with Ehad Haam. What I would be curious to know is: if you object to efforts that would result in a peace agreement, and the creation of a Palestinian state, what do you see as the alternative; and how would any such alternative - that ultimately means continuing a conflict that is costly in so many respects - be in Israel's interest? The right was sneering when Olmert said some two years ago "We are tired of fighting", but all the sneering won't change the fact that Olmert was right. And is it not more prudent and moral to try to end fighting?
8 | Yosef, Israel, Tuesday Sep 09, 2008
Einstein once said that repeating the same experiment again and again and expecting a different result is a sign of madness. How many of the "peace" apologists would be willing to talk to even one of the hundreds of families bereaved by palestinian terror and tell them there is no "alternative" but to continue with this madness? What morality is there in endangering the lives of innocent civilians for a piece of paper? What is this "territorial compromise" - more missile launching pads for terrorists, some of whom now masquerade as "peace partners"?!
9 | AKUS MD USA, Sunday Sep 14, 2008
Hi Petra - some relief here from the endless CIF nonsense. I regard Livni as Israel's best hope for systematic progress to a resolution of the dispute/war with the Palestinians. She reminds me a lot of Yitzchak Rabin - the same clarity of thought, pragmatism, and resolve to to reach a solution.
|
Top Rated Posts
Tags:Blogroll |